Montana State University
Academics | Administration | Admissions | A-Z Index | Directories

Montana State Universityspacer Mountains and Minds
MSU AcademicsspacerMSU AdministrationspacerMSU AdmissionsspacerMSU A-Z IndexspacerMSU Directoriesspacer
 
> Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics > CASMGS
CASMGS People

Principal Investigators:  Susan Capalbo (Executive Committee), John Antle, Rick Engel, Duane Griffith, Perry Miller, Siân Mooney, Linda Young

Other Participants:
 
Ross Bricklemyer, Jetse Stoorvogel, Roberto Valdivia

Principal Investigators:
Photo of Susan Capalbo
Susan Capalbo
(Executive Committee)
Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Economics
scapalbo@montana.edu
Website
  As the PI for the CASMGS project and research efforts, I am responsible for the overall objective of the funding which is to develop the data, models, and understanding needed to assess the potential for soil C sequestration in U.S. agriculture, and to communicate this information to stakeholders. As a member of the CASMGS Executive Committee, we are developing a vision of the final products that the research program will produce. This vision must begin with an understanding of how policies or markets for soil C sequestration could be designed and implemented. This understanding in turn should be used to guide the research agenda for data collection, modeling, and related analysis.

I am also involved in the biophysical-economic modeling of agricultural production systems in the northern Great Plains. The objective is to conduct basic research to assess the economic feasibility of increasing soil C through changes in land use and related management practices and through the adoption of new technologies. Finally, we want to estimate and develop mechanisms to measure carbon levels made available as a result of land use changes. Key issues are how C rates for contracts with farmers will be established, how those rates will be verified over time, and how the practices specified in contracts will be monitored. The use of prototype policy or contract designs would be an effective way to prioritize the kinds of carbon level measurements that may be needed.
 

Photo of John Antle
John Antle
Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Economics
jantle@montana.edu
Website

I will be further developing a biophysical-economic approach to modeling agricultural production systems, and utilizing that approach to predict changes in soil organic carbon storage and greenhouse gas fluxes. Comparisons between farm-scale and county-scale models will be made to assess their validity for policy and market analysis. I also will be investigating how to design contracts for soil carbon sequestration to meet the needs of both producers and buyers of soil carbon. Buyers may include the federal government and market participants and their contract needs are likely to differ. Simulations of the integrated model will be used to assess farmers' participation in per-hectare and per-tonne contracts. These results will be used to construct supply curves for soil carbon and to assess the economic feasibility of soil carbon sequestration for major production systems in Montana, Nebraska, and the central United States.

 

Photo of Rick Engel
Rick Engel
Dept. of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences
engel@montana.edu
Website

We are trying to understand whether the quantity and quality (C:N) of  surface crop residue has any impact on the ability of soils to sequester carbon. Carbon sequestration is defined as the net removal of CO2 from the atmosphere into long-lived pools of carbon. Volume and mass of surface residue inputs can vary greatly due to site-specific differences in production (landscape effects) and surface residue redistribution by farm machinery. Our research will determine whether surface inputs (quantity and quality) impact C sequestration or whether C sequestration in the soil is a function of root inputs.

We are concerned about nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from agricultural ecosystems because N2O is a greenhouse gas that is 310 times more powerful than CO2 at trapping heat in the atmosphere. To investigate if changing cropping system practices, including reduced tillage, affects nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural soils we will be including vented soil covers for the measurement of N2O emissions from soils. Gas samples will be collected periodically thru the 2003 and 2004 cropping seasons at a farm site in northern Montana. Analysis of gas samples for N2O will enable us to characterize season patterns of emissions and the quantity of N2O lost to the atmosphere from soils in this region. We hope to confirm that soil and crop management practices that are associated with improved carbon sequestration are consistent with reduced or minimal N2O emissions.
 

Photo of Duane Griffith Duane Griffith
Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Economics
griffith@montana.edu
Website

To a large extent, cropping systems used by farmers determine the amount of carbon sequestered in the soil. Cropping systems also affect other greenhouse gases. In general, no-till cropping practices result in more carbon stored in the soil. However, farmers must make the decision to move towards no-till carefully. While no-till practices can produce benefits for the land, there are tradeoffs to consider. Past research has shown that yields may not increase with a no-till cropping system. Higher chemicals use is necessary to offset weeds controlled by mechanical tillage systems. Farmers may have to invest in bigger machinery compliments for no-till systems. The economics of no-till must be carefully considered by individual farmers. We will work closely with researchers at Montana State University and the other universities involved in CASMGS to provide farmers with a computerized decision support system to evaluate their unique financial and economic situation in comparing tillage systems.
 

Photo of Perry Miller
Perry Miller
Dept. of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences
pmiller@montana.edu
Website

We are examining the value of "best management practices" in accumulating soil organic carbon in Montana cropland. One project looks at the historical (6 - 10 years) effect on soil organic carbon in "across the fence" comparisons of no-till vs. conventional tillage management for six farm pairs in north central Montana. These results are used to validate model predictions by measuring increases in soil organic carbon as affected by tillage system (significantly greater in no-till) and soil texture (higher the clay content, more pronounced the tillage effect). A second project is designed to be long-term (minimum 5 years) and investigates soil carbon effects due to land conversion to no-till management, and the effect of intensifying cropping systems from crop-fallow to annual cropping. This research takes place on 80-acre fields in north central Montana (the 'Triangle') with farmers implementing all land management practices. Measurements of nitrous oxide emissions, another important greenhouse gas, and economic costs associated with alternative management practices addressed in this project.
 

Photo of Sian Mooney
Siān Mooney
Dept. of Economics
Boise State University
sianmooney@boisestate.edu
Website
There are many unresolved issues related to carbon sequestration, not least policy design, soil carbon measurement protocols and uncertainty regarding which management practices will be most economically efficient at sequestering carbon. I will be working on several of these questions. With Perry Miller, I will examine the economics of switching from conventional to reduced tillage to sequester additional soil C. With John Antle and Susan Capalbo, I will be designing and exploring the economic feasibility of a range of measurement schemes for soil C as well as contract design. With several other CASMGS collaborators at MSU, and other institutions, I will be examining the potential role that agroforestry practices can play in sequestering soil C as well as trying to quantify their additional co-benefits.

 

Photo of Linda Young
Linda Young
Dept. of Political Science
lmyoung@montana.edu
Website

It is unclear at this time if the potential to pay producers to sequester carbon will occur in a market framework, through government conservation programs, or a mix of both. I will be analyzing current national and international policies that are likely to affect the development of carbon sequestration programs. U.S. government programs will need to be structured to abide by U.S. commitments under the World Trade Organization's Agreement on Agriculture. Questions also exist at the international level on the compatibility of WTO disciplines and the Kyoto Protocols' approach to reduce CO2 emissions and to trading emission reduction units.

Other Participants:
 

Photo of Ross Bricklemyer
Ross Bricklemyer
Dept. of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences
rsb@montana.edu

I graduated from Montana State University with a B.S. in Land Resources and Environmental Science (soil science option) in 2000 and recently earned my M.S. in Land Resources and Environmental Science also from MSU. As a Research Associate working primarily with the CASMGS project, my main responsibilities are 1) to serve as the primary contact for the six farmer cooperators involved with CASMGS in north central Montana and 2) to measure soil organic carbon and crop biomass production at each of the CASMGS research sites. In addition to having a great interest in the interactions of soil properties and cropping systems on soil carbon dynamics, I am also interested in the potential use of satellite imagery to further support a carbon trading market. In conjunction with the CASMGS project, I am also looking into the potential use of satellite imagery for documenting agricultural management practices and estimating input variables for the Century model.
      

Photo of Jetse Stoorvogel
Jetse Stoorvogel
Lab. of Soil Science and Geology
University of Wageningen,
The Netherlands
jetse.stoorvogel@wur.nl

Jetse Stoorvogel is an Associate Professor in the Laboratory of Soil Science and Geology, University of Wageningen, The Netherlands. He received his Ph.D. in Soil Science and Agronomy and his M.Sc. in Soil Science from Wageningen University. His research interests include soil inventory, land evaluation, GIS applications, and tradeoffs in sustainable agriculture and the environment.

He will be working on adapting the Tradeoff Analysis Model software (developed by Montana State University, in collaboration with other research institutions, in research supported by USAID) to interface with Century, WEPP, and new economic models. He plans to provide a transparent, user-friendly interface that will allow dynamic simulation results to predict changes in soil organic carbon storage and greenhouse gas fluxes.
  

Photo of Roberto Valdivia
Roberto Valdivia
Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Economics
valdivia@montana.edu
Website

Roberto O. Valdivia graduated from the Universidad Nacional del Altiplano-Puno, Peru with a B.S. in Economic Sciences in 1995. In 1996 he earned the title of Economist Engineer. He was involved in projects funded by the International Development Research Centre-Canada in Bolivia, and then he worked at the International Potato Center in Lima, Peru as a research assistant and consultant for several projects in the Andean region. In 1998 he began working for the Tradeoffs in Sustainable Agriculture Project funded by the U.S. Agency for International Development. He obtained his MSc. in Applied Economics in the Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics at Montana State University. Current research includes modifying the Tradeoff Analysis method and TOA model software to be applied in different analysis, such as soil conservation investments, carbon sequestration and policy decision analysis in the Andes and the United States.
 
 
View Text-only Version Text-only Updated: 1/18/08
spacer
spacer
© Montana State University 2005 Didn't Find it? Please use our contact list or our site index.